Loading AttackTrace...
Loading AttackTrace...
Application Exhaustion Flood (T1499.003) is a MITRE ATT&CK technique associated with Impact . Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Application Exhaustion Flood (T1499.003) is a MITRE ATT&CK technique associated with Impact. Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Attackers use Application Exhaustion Flood because it provides a reliable way to advance their objective within the Impact tactic, often with a favorable balance of impact versus detectability on Windows, IaaS, Linux, macOS environments. Defenders should assess this behavior in the context of the affected platform and adjacent activity rather than treating it as a standalone indicator.
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications. For example, specific features in web applications may be highly resource intensive. Repeated requests to those features may be able to exhaust system resources and deny access to the application or the server itself.(Citation: Arbor AnnualDoSreport Jan 2018)
No universal command represents Application Exhaustion Flood. Capture the exact command line, arguments, parent process, account, host, and execution time from the investigated environment; do not operationalize unverified examples.
| Event ID | Log Channel | What It Indicates |
|---|---|---|
| Environment-specific | Relevant Windows channel(s) | Correlate authentication, process, object-access, and configuration events with the observed execution context. |
| Sysmon Event ID | Name | Why It's Relevant Here |
|---|---|---|
| Environment-specific | Validate configured telemetry | Use process, network, file, registry, DNS, or image-load telemetry only when relevant and enabled. |
No MITRE detection guidance published for this technique.
Relevant ATT&CK Data Sources: N/A
A universal Sigma rule would create unreliable results because this technique has no single guaranteed observable. Build detection logic from a documented behavior and supported data source, scope it to the affected platform, and validate it against benign administrative activity before deployment.
Start with the data sources named in the detection section. Scope searches by asset, identity, and time window; correlate the primary behavior with preceding access and subsequent actions. A portable query is intentionally not provided where the technique lacks a universal schema or observable.